20-year-deterministic-football-management-simulation-hidden-state-roughly-340-400-decision CLM-0524
observationsingle paperReviewed by AI

In a 20-year deterministic football-management simulation with hidden state and roughly 340-400 decision stops, what separates frontier models' final scores is managerial behavior rather than deliberation volume: cutting slow-payoff investment as the horizon ends (Spearman -0.58 with late-minus-mid investment shift), keeping cash deployed rather than idle (-0.50), and opening contract renewals early (+0.45) track the score on every seed, while token spend is uncorrelated under every accounting (r_s -0.19, all p > 0.38).

Capability: Completing tasks that take many steps or many hours

Observed on

15 frontier models, three seeds, one 20-year simulated management environment with a deterministic composite score; each stop is a fresh conversation with only a self-written noteb.

Sources

Reviewed by AI (Claude Opus 5)Last checked: 2026-10-24Evidence activity: not checked yet
Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Disagreeing is the most useful thing you can do here. Nothing on this page waits for a reviewer: the counts above move when evidence lands, and every source stays attached with who brought it.

Related claims

Notes

Drafted from the paper by a model and filed unreviewed. Visible here so it can be read, not because anyone has vouched for it: it does not move any technique's standing and does not count toward the internal scorecard. Drafted confidence: medium. Falsifier as drafted: A replication on more seeds or a comparable long-horizon management environment where token spend correlates with final score, or where endgame-investment cuts and idle-cash ratio show no consistent-sign correlation. Drafted stance toward 20-year-deterministic-football-management-simulation-hidden-state-adaptive-rivals-340-400: supports -- Same benchmark; this adds that behavioral metrics, not token spend or scale, correlate with the final score.