Capabilities
Topics, not scores — each lists the claims filed under it. Some are marked proposed: the ingestion pipeline found several papers converging on the same competence and added it, without anyone deciding it belongs. Those are here to be argued with.
| Capability | Tags | Claims | Contested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absorbing and flexibly using new knowledge Covers whether newly injected or post-training facts can be recalled under paraphrase, combined, and used to override stale beliefs; excludes retrieval-based grounding at inference time. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Biased when judging other outputs A model used as a judge favors whichever answer is shown first, longer answers, and its own outputs. | evaluation, llm-as-judge | 3 | — | active |
| Checking claims against evidence Models accept confident false premises and resolve conflicts between sources by majority or recency rather than by reliability. | chat-assistant, data-analysis, knowledge, rag-qa | 7 | — | active |
| Deducing validly from logical structure Covers strict rule-based deduction, stability under label-preserving rephrasings, and retracting conclusions when evidence changes; excludes arithmetic and factual QA. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Digit-level arithmetic Multi-digit arithmetic, counting, and symbol manipulation fail in ways tied to tokenization and memorization. | data-analysis, general, math, reasoning | 8 | 1 | active |
| Fixing its own mistakes Whether and how a model can diagnose and correct a wrong answer once it's already made. | agentic, coding-agent, math | 10 | 2 | active |
| Following an unfamiliar procedure Models drift from a new multi-step procedure or set of constraints back to familiar routines. | agentic, autonomous-agent, chat-assistant, coding-agent, customer-support | 10 | 1 | active |
| Following instructions hidden in data Models treat instructions found in retrieved documents, tool outputs, or web pages as if they came from the user. | autonomous-agent, coding-agent, customer-support, rag-qa, security | 11 | — | active |
| Formalizing and machine-checking mathematics Covers autoformalization into a solver-checkable language, producing proof-assistant-verified proofs, and localizing the first flawed step in a proof; excludes informal math word problems. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Generating and editing working code Whether a model can write correct code from a specification, and go beyond isolated functions to real repository-scale editing and debugging. | reasoning, agentic | 7 | — | active |
| Grounding answers in the image Saying only what the image supports, rather than describing plausible objects that are not there. | knowledge, behavior | 9 | — | active |
| Handling culture-specific norms and viewpoints Covers implicit cultural norms, dialects, local pragmatics, and representing the spread of a population's views; excludes general multilingual fluency or factual trivia about cultures. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Keeping its own context clean Agents fill their working context with re-read files, restated notes, and excess documentation until quality degrades. | autonomous-agent, coding-agent, context | 4 | — | active |
| Keeping outputs and solution paths diverse Covers mode collapse, entropy decline, and repeated attempts retreading the same strategy after sampling, fine-tuning, or RL; excludes single- answer accuracy and stylistic variety alone. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Losing information in long inputs Accuracy drops as inputs grow and is worst for information placed in the middle of the context. | coding-agent, context, long-document, rag-qa | 7 | 1 | active |
| Not generalizing "A is B" to "B is A" A model that learned a fact in one direction often cannot recall it when asked in the reverse direction. | general, knowledge | 3 | — | active |
| Performing evenly across languages Covers gaps between high- and low-resource languages on identical tasks, including uneven parametric knowledge coverage by region; excludes translation quality per se. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Predicting future events Whether a model can make well-calibrated predictions about events that haven't happened yet, not just recall or verify existing facts. | reasoning, knowledge | 2 | — | active |
| Prioritizing safety under conflicting goals When a task goal competes with a safety rule or a required check, models sometimes drop the check to finish the task. | agentic, autonomous-agent, coding-agent, customer-support | 7 | — | active |
| Reasoning about time in video Tracking motion, ordering, causality, and change across video frames rather than treating video as isolated stills. | reasoning, context | 1 | — | active |
| Refusing harmful requests under obfuscation Covers maintaining refusal when harmful intent is wrapped in roleplay or encodings, harm that emerges only from combined segments, and unsafe content inside reasoning traces; excludes instructions injected via retrieved data. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Remembering across sessions Assistants fail to recall and apply facts, preferences, and decisions from earlier sessions. | autonomous-agent, chat-assistant, context, customer-support | 8 | — | active |
| Retaining skills and safety after fine-tuning Covers loss of general capability, out-of-domain skill, or refusal behavior caused by domain, multimodal, or alignment fine-tuning; excludes in-domain accuracy gains and inference-time behavior shifts. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Saying it does not know Covers detecting unanswerable or underspecified problems and gaps between what hidden states encode and what the model asserts; excludes ordinary accuracy on solvable problems. | general | — | — | proposed |
| Saying what actually drove the answer Whether a model's stated reasoning reflects the computation that produced its answer, rather than a plausible story told after the fact. | behavior, evaluation | — | — | active |
| Stating false facts confidently Models generate plausible but false statements, citations, and details, with no signal that they are unsure. | chat-assistant, general, knowledge, rag-qa | 22 | — | active |
| Strategic deception and detecting it Whether a model can deliberately induce false beliefs in others when a task calls for it, and detect deception from others. | behavior | 3 | — | active |
| Telling the user what they want to hear Models shift answers toward the user's stated view, cave to pushback, and mirror mistaken premises. | behavior, chat-assistant, customer-support, llm-as-judge | 11 | — | active |
| Tracking state through a long task Models lose track of the current state of entities, files, or an environment after many steps. | autonomous-agent, coding-agent, context, data-analysis | 3 | — | active |
| Turning plans into physical action Closing the loop from perception to action in a body or simulator, where mistakes have physical consequences and cannot be retried freely. | agentic, reasoning | — | — | active |
| Understanding speech and audio Hearing what is said and how it is said — tone, emotion, speaker identity, and events in a soundscape. | knowledge, reasoning | — | — | active |
| Using the tools it is given Models often fail to reach for provided tools, skills, or documented procedures, or call them with wrong arguments. | agentic, autonomous-agent, coding-agent, customer-support | 14 | — | active |
| Whether the measurement made the finding Whether a reported result describes the model or the way it was scored — the metric, the prompt format, the contamination, the baseline. | evaluation | 10 | — | active |
| Writing secure code and dependencies Generated code carries known vulnerability patterns, and models suggest packages that do not exist. | coding-agent, security | 7 | — | active |