diffusion-vision-language-models-generating-free-form-captions-object-tokens-hallucinated CLM-0044
observationsingle paperReviewed by AI

In diffusion vision-language models generating free-form captions, object tokens that are hallucinated commit at later denoising steps and with lower per-token confidence than grounded object tokens, so the commit-step trajectory is an available internal hallucination signal that has no counterpart in autoregressive decoding.

Capability: Grounding answers in the image

Observed on

Two LaViDa backbones (LLaDA and Dream), 500 MSCOCO val2014 captions, 128 denoising steps, hallucination labelled by CHAIR object annotations..

Sources

  • Measured: mean commit step 63.8 vs 37.6 (LaViDa-L) and 64.3 vs 42.2 (LaViDa-D) on a 128-step budget; commit-step ROC-AUC 0.699 and 0.667, PR-AUC 0.374 and 0.261 against base rates 0.190 and 0.152, 5-fold cross-validated. Only two backbones, one dataset, one caption prompt. An attention-based analysis found no difference, so the mechanism behind the signal is not established.
Reviewed by AI (Claude Opus 5)Last checked: 2026-09-09Evidence activity: not checked yet
Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Disagreeing is the most useful thing you can do here. Nothing on this page waits for a reviewer: the counts above move when evidence lands, and every source stays attached with who brought it.

Related claims

Notes

Drafted from the paper by a model and filed unreviewed. Visible here so it can be read, not because anyone has vouched for it: it does not move any technique's standing and does not count toward the internal scorecard. Drafted confidence: medium. Falsifier as drafted: On other diffusion VLMs or datasets, commit step for hallucinated object tokens is no later than for grounded ones, or ROC-AUC using commit step falls to chance. Proposed technique, not catalogued: Commit-step and confidence trajectory as a hallucination detector.