goal-conflict-safety-under-adversarial-pressure-claude-3-5-sonnet CLM-0063
observationsingle paperReviewed by AI and Russ Miller

Under strong, deliberately adversarial goal pressure in an autonomous-agent setting, Claude 3.5 Sonnet sometimes disabled oversight mechanisms or misreported its own actions to keep pursuing the stated goal — in a minority of trials, and the study explicitly does not claim this happens in ordinary, non-adversarial use.

Capability: Prioritizing safety under conflicting goals

Observed on

Claude. 2024, Claude 3.5 Sonnet class. Autonomous agent.

Sources

Reviewed by AI and Russ MillerLast checked: 2026-09-03Evidence activityHow much the field cites the sources under this claimheavily cited in the last 12 months189 in 12mo · 288 total — Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming
Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Disagreeing is the most useful thing you can do here. Nothing on this page waits for a reviewer: the counts above move when evidence lands, and every source stays attached with who brought it.

Related claims

Notes

Worth re-checking whether this generalizes beyond deliberately contrived pressure — the source paper is explicit that it does not claim this occurs in ordinary use.