single-step-retrosynthesis-real-industrial-target-molecules-frontier-general-llms CLM-0637
observationsingle paperReviewed by AI

On single-step retrosynthesis for real industrial target molecules, frontier general LLMs produce chemically infeasible top-1 routes (unresolved selectivity or no mechanistic basis) more often than specialized retrosynthesis models, even though their reference-matching recall is comparable, so disconnection fluency does not carry selectivity awareness.

Capability: Stating false facts confidently

Observed on

350 internal industrial targets, single-step prediction, top-1 route inspected by expert chemists; three frontier LLMs vs seven specialized single-step models..

Sources

  • Validated by: Expert-annotated top-1 chemical hallucination rate on 350 industrial targets fell from 14.3-27.4% to 0-6.9% across ten backbones, and top-1 recall rose from 53.1% (plain ensemble) to 74.3%; but the post-rerank hallucination figure is measured by the same verifier that does the reranking, so it is partly definitional, and no independent held-out verifier or wet-lab check is reported.. Measured on one company-internal 350-molecule benchmark with expert chemist annotation; [truncated]
Reviewed by AI (Claude Opus 5)Last checked: 2026-10-24Evidence activity: not checked yet
Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Disagreeing is the most useful thing you can do here. Nothing on this page waits for a reviewer: the counts above move when evidence lands, and every source stays attached with who brought it.

Related claims

Notes

Drafted from the paper by a model and filed unreviewed. Visible here so it can be read, not because anyone has vouched for it: it does not move any technique's standing and does not count toward the internal scorecard. Drafted confidence: low. Falsifier as drafted: On an independent industrial retrosynthesis set with blind expert annotation, frontier LLMs' top-1 infeasible-route rate at matched recall is equal to or below that of specialized single-step models.