arxiv-2306-03314 SRC-0033 · paper

Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents

Yashar Talebirad, Amirhossein Nadiri

Created: 2023-06-05 · Ingested: 2026-09-14

In this paper, we present a novel framework for enhancing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by leveraging the power of multi-agent systems. Our framework introduces a collaborative environment where multiple intelligent agent components, each with distinctive attributes and roles, work together to handle complex tasks more efficiently and effectively. We demonstrate the practicality and versatility of our framework through case studies in artificial general intelligence (AGI), specifically focusing on the Auto-GPT and BabyAGI models. We also examine the "Gorilla" model, which integrates external APIs into the LLM. Our framework addresses limitations and challenges such as looping issues, security risks, scalability, system evaluation, and ethical considerations. By modeling various domains such as courtroom simulations and software development scenarios, we showcas…

In brief

This is a position and design paper, not an evaluation: it proposes a formalism for multi-agent LLM systems and argues that it could fix known failure modes, without measuring anything.

The framework models the environment as a graph G(V,E) whose vertices are agents and plugins and whose edges are message channels. Agents are tuples of (language model instance, role, state, permission to create agents, set of agents they may halt); plugins carry functionalities, configurations, and usage constraints. Components include an oracle agent that is stateless and memory-less, a supervisor agent with authority to halt, and paired feedback agents that simulate self-critique.

The paper then re-describes Auto-GPT, BabyAGI, and Gorilla in this notation and sketches how added supervisor or oracle agents might break Auto-GPT's looping behaviour, screen code execution in continuous mode, or catch hallucinations in API calls. Two illustrative scenarios are described in prose: a courtroom with judge, jury, attorney, witness, and clerk agents, and a software team with 8 roles.

There are no experiments, no benchmarks, no baselines, and no reported numbers. Every claimed improvement is argued rather than measured, and the authors themselves list scalability and the absence of suitable evaluation metrics as open problems.

Treat it as vocabulary for describing agent topologies, not as evidence that multi-agent structure helps.

Written from the abstract by claude-opus-5 on 2026-09-15, with every figure checked against it. Not a substitute for the paper.

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

No claims cite this yet.