Training-Free Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models via Persona Disagreement

Disagreement between culturally grounded personas, not their consensus, carries the usable signal for steering a model's moral preferences at inference time. DISCA instantiates each country as a panel of 4 World-Values-Survey-grounded persona agents, converts the panel's logit-gap variance into a bounded loss-averse correction via prospect-theory importance sampling, and shrinks the correction when 2 independent half-budget passes disagree. No weight updates, no per-country reward models, only decision-token logprobs.

On the MultiTP trolley benchmark across 20 countries and 7 open-weight backbones (2B-70B, 5 families), macro misalignment (L2 distance to human AMCE vectors) drops 10-24% on the 6 backbones at or above 3.8B, 3.4% on the 2B Gemma, and 2-7% on open-ended scenarios. Phi-4 (14B) with DISCA reaches 0.346 MIS, below vanilla Llama-3.3-70B. On the Phi-4 grid DISCA beats all training-free baselines (PRISM prompt 0.384, activation steering 0.430, vanilla 0.454) and 2 oracle baselines fit on human AMCEs (0.506, 0.513).

Evidence is measured, with a 4-component ablation on 3 backbones (removing personas costs the most, +.047 to +.061 MIS, hurting 16-18 of 20 countries), 3 seeds, and compute matched between the dual-pass gate and a single full pass. Alignment target is a crowdsourced survey statistic, not legitimacy. The effect does not transfer to factual cultural QA on BLEnD, and costs roughly 4x vanilla latency. Useful if you need per-country value calibration behind a logprob-exposing API.