arxiv-2606-21666 SRC-0091 · paper

Hallucination as Context Drift: Synchronization Protocols for Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Carson Rodrigues

Created: 2026-06-19 · Ingested: 2026-09-09

Multi-agent LLM systems hallucinate for a reason model quality alone does not explain: context drift, the divergence of knowledge states between concurrent agents. The paper defines a Context Divergence Score between agent pairs and a Shared State Verification Protocol (SSVP) in which agents periodically exchange compressed state summaries and flag high divergence before reasoning jointly. On travel planning with three Claude Haiku agents (n=30 per condition, 8 scenarios), naive full-broadcast synchronisation raised hallucination rate 34% above no synchronisation (0.658 vs 0.492, p=0.0022, d=1.18) by propagating one agent's erroneous state; SSVP avoided that and reduced hallucination modestly (0.463, d=0.30) with 58% fewer API calls. The contamination effect did not appear in the software-planning domain, where every condition converged below 0.2.

In brief

Making agents share their full context with each other can raise hallucination rather than lower it, because one agent's erroneous state propagates to all the others.

Three Claude Haiku agents (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001) collaborate on travel itineraries drawn from 8 destinations, with deliberate mismatches injected at initialization (wrong-month weather, wrong airport codes, truncated schedule). Conditions: no-sync, full-broadcast, and SSVP, which computes a pairwise cosine-distance Context Divergence Score on 384-dimensional summary embeddings and synchronizes only above a threshold of 0.25.

No-sync hallucination rate was 0.492; full-broadcast rose to 0.658, 34% higher (p = 0.0022, d = 1.18), and task coherence fell from 0.342 to 0.229 (p = 0.0024, d = 1.02). SSVP reached 0.463, not significant vs no-sync (p = 0.257, d = 0.30) but clearly below full-broadcast (p = 0.0005, d = 1.47) with 58% fewer API calls. Full-broadcast also had the lowest divergence score (0.097–0.107) alongside the worst outputs, and divergence did not predict hallucination in no-sync (r = -0.03).

The contamination effect is measured with matched scenarios and pairwise Welch tests, though full-broadcast ran only n = 15 on cost grounds and SSVP's own gain is within noise. It did not replicate in a software sprint-planning domain (n = 10/10/5; all conditions under 0.2), and only 3 agents, 1 model, and structured planning tasks were tested.

If you broadcast agent state indiscriminately, gate it on divergence instead.

Written from the abstract by claude-opus-5 on 2026-09-09, with every figure checked against it. Not a substitute for the paper.

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsIn multi-agent LLM systems where one agent starts with an erroneous shared belief, broadcasting every agent's full context at every step raises the rate of false assertions above doing no synchronization at all, because the error propagates to agents that were previously correct — and the harm appears only in tasks where one wrong fact cascades across semantically linked dimensions (destination to airport to weather), not where agent contexts are largely orthogonal.