arxiv-2608-18579 SRC-0422 · paperMR-IQA-2: Faithful Image Quality Reflection via Fine-Grained Credit Assignment
Yuan li, Youyuan Lin, Chenhui Chu, Shin’ya Nishida
Created: 2026-08-19 · Ingested: 2026-10-17
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18579(opens in a new tab)Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for image quality assessment (IQA) by improving consistency between quality ratings and their underlying reasoning. However, most approaches supervise reasoning through human-provided ratings and rarely examine whether it faithfully reflects image quality. Rating accuracy alone does not ensure faithful reasoning; a shared reward also obscures supervision sources and may reinforce unfaithful reasoning when a correct rating occurs by chance. To improve the faithfulness and reliability of blind IQA, we aim to (1) decouple credit
Referenced by
Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.
- supportsIn RL-trained multimodal image-quality models, applying the reasoning reward only to reasoning tokens and the human-rating reward only to rating tokens keeps rating alignment at the level of rating-only training while turning reasoning-guided edit quality gain positive, and it prevents the collapse to a single universal edit that an unmasked shared reward produces despite that variant's larger raw gain.
- supportsIn RL-trained multimodal image-quality models, supervising reasoning with the rating reward alone raises rating alignment while making the stated reasoning less faithful — rating-only training reached an average PLCC/SRCC of 0.836/0.815 yet its reasoning-guided edits lowered judged image quality (mean gain -0.260, worse than the untrained baseline's -0.136).