Agent Zero Memory: Provenance-Aware Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents

On long-term conversational memory benchmarks, the retrieval substrate rather than the backbone model appears to set the ceiling: accuracy across 8 very different LLMs varies by only 3.4 points while per-query cost varies by ~30x.

Agent Zero Memory builds 3 parallel stores from a user's chats, files and connectors: an episodic events timeline, an entity-event graph, and a curated Hierarchical Documentary Memory with 6 categories and L0/L1/L2 detail levels. A query passes an intent gate, a source router, then 3 concurrent agentic searches over hybrid pgvector (3072-dim) + BM25/fuzzy retrieval fused by reciprocal rank fusion at k=60, with answers restricted to evidence actually opened.

Reported accuracy is 95.60% on LongMemEval (500 questions) versus Mastra at 94.87% and Zep at 71.20%, and 93.60% on LoCoMo (1,540 questions) versus Mem0 at 92.50%. deepseek-v4-pro reaches 92.20% at $0.001768 per query, roughly 20x cheaper than gpt-5.5; glm5.2fast is fastest at 6.16 s median.

The backbone study is controlled (memory, retriever and control logic fixed, only the model varied). The cross-system comparison is not: competitor figures are best publicly reported numbers under their own harnesses and judges. The retrieval-channel ablation is the only component isolation (embedding-only -1.20, grep -1.60, lexical -1.80); removing individual memories or the intent gate is left to future work, so the 3-store claim is argued, not measured.

All accuracies are single-run, LLM-judged, on 2 near-saturated benchmarks; no test of organizational-scale corpora or connector sources.

Treat this as evidence that memory-system engineering, not model choice, buys accuracy here, and as weak evidence for the specific 3-store decomposition.