arxiv-2608-30021 SRC-0667 · paper

Error Detection for PET/CT Radiology Reports: Domain-Specific vs Large Language Models

Created: 2026-08-30 · Ingested: 2026-10-24

Errors in radiology reports can adversely affect patient treatment, yet automated report quality assurance remains challenging because errors are often subtle and require domain expertise to detect. Although large language models (LLMs) have recently been proposed for radiology report verification, their ability to detect clinically meaningful errors beyond chest X-ray datasets remains under-explored. To this end, we present the first systematic evaluation of language models for PET/CT report error detection, comparing compact domain-specific models with SOTA open-weight LLMs. We collected 30,

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsFor detecting findings-conclusion inconsistencies in oncology PET/CT radiology reports, a 15M-parameter BERT pre-trained on in-domain reports reaches higher balanced accuracy and lower false-positive rate than zero- or few-shot prompted 27B-70B open-weight LLMs, and LoRA fine-tuning the 70B model only matches the small model rather than beating it.