arxiv-2609-04483 SRC-0553 · paper

Integrating Crash Report Mining and LLMs for Bug Localization and Repair: An Industrial Report

Marcos Medeiros, Uirá Kulesza, Christoph Treude, Daniel Lucena, Rafael Gomes, Roberta Coelho

Created: 2026-09-03 · Ingested: 2026-09-28

Analyzing crash-report bugs in large-scale industrial software systems requires substantial maintenance effort, particularly in production environments where developers must handle large volumes of crash reports and source code artifacts to localize and fix their root causes. While recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can assist with maintenance tasks, little is known about their effectiveness in supporting developers in analyzing crash-report bugs and repairing bugs associated with groups of crash reports in industrial settings. To address this gap, we investigate wheth

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsFor repair of production crash bugs in large Java enterprise systems, feeding an LLM the source of the top-3 suspicious files plus a representative stack trace localizes the developer-modified code in about 71% of responses and yields a semantically valid patch in about 52%, and adding an explicit ranking of suspicious files and methods helps only when the full stack trace is withheld (per-response repair 28% to 47% with stack messages only) while slightly lowering performance when the stack trace is already present.