arxiv-2609-05069 SRC-0681 · paper

A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support

Created: 2026-09-04 · Ingested: 2026-10-24

Large language models (LLMs) show potential for medical tasks, but their single-turn question-answer format does not reflect how clinical diagnosis is performed in practice. As a result, they remain limited in complex diagnostic settings. We developed Debate-Mixture-of-Agents (DMoA), a novel multi-agent framework that structures role-based interaction to support iterative diagnostic reasoning. Base models and DMoA were evaluated on 297 rare disease cases and 1,719 challenging cases. Across both datasets, DMoA improved most likely diagnosis accuracy by 10.21 percentage points and safety rate by

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsOn complex clinical diagnosis from published case reports (rare disease and challenging cases), running several presenter-rebutter debater pairs on one backbone and synthesizing their revised hypotheses with an aggregator raises exact-match diagnostic accuracy and rated safety over the same model prompted once, while giving no measurable gain on multiple-choice clinical knowledge questions.