arxiv-2609-14302 SRC-0263 · paper

E2A-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence-to-Action Reliability in Financial Chart Reasoning

Created: 2026-09-13 · Ingested: 2026-09-18

Can financial vision-language models (VLMs) turn chart evidence into reliable action recommendations? Existing hallucination evaluations are mostly claim-centric; they assess whether generated statements are supported, but not whether evidence remains traceable through rationale, confidence, and final action. We introduce E2A-Bench, a 969-query benchmark for financial chart reasoning, constructed from 323 HS300 constituents under three input modalities with deterministic OHLCV-derived evidence anchors. E2A-Bench evaluates grounding, reasoning-action consistency, evidence-confidence calibration

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsWhen a hallucination metric is an unsupported-claim rate computed over whatever claims a model happens to make, models that avoid committing to verifiable claims or directional outputs score best, so the ranking partly measures abstention rather than grounding — on financial chart-to-recommendation tasks the lowest unsupported-claim model made directional recommendations on only 6.4% of queries and ranked near the bottom once coverage was factored in.