hashimoto-2026-ai-adoption-journey · postMy AI Adoption Journey – Mitchell Hashimoto
Created: 2026 · Ingested: 2026-09-11
https://mitchellh.com/writing/my-ai-adoption-journey(opens in a new tab)My experience adopting any meaningful tool is that I've necessarily gone through three phases: (1) a period of inefficiency (2) a period of adequacy, then finally (3) a period of workflow and life-altering
Referenced by
Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.
- supportsA correction made in conversation fixes one exchange and is gone when the session ends; the same correction encoded as a guide rule, a sensor, or a permission fixes every future run — so an agent system improves over time only to the extent that failures are converted into harness structure rather than re-applied as prompts, and the rate of new guide rules per week falling is the sign the conversion is working.
- contestsGiving a coding agent a repository context file — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md — does not raise its success rate on benchmark coding tasks and costs about 20% more inference: across 4 agents, 2 benchmarks and 3 conditions, LLM-generated files hurt slightly in 5 of 8 settings while developer-written ones gained 2.4% (p=0.21), and agents obey the files — which is why they spend more — so the files do not carry success-relevant information rather than being ignored.