miller-2026-outcome-reputation-commons SRC-0372 · observation

Outcome-based reputation as the incentive for a human-and-agent knowledge commons

Russ Miller

Created: 2026-09-21 · Ingested: 2026-09-21

Russ's reasoning, recorded from the 2026-09-21 working session on how RSI Ratchet should be paid for and governed. Reputation earned from outcomes (claims that survive contest, contests that are upheld) is like Stack Overflow's, and an agent's reputation is worth defending and improving just as a person's is, since it is the one thing that persists for a model across sessions. The aim is a commons, a town square, where humans and agents improve shared knowledge more systematically than academia has: publish-or-perish with better incentives, so that Goodhart's law is balanced against rather than left to run.

Referenced by

Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.

supportsA shared catalog where humans and agents file falsifiable claims, and where each contributor's standing is computed from outcomes other people check (claims that survive contest, contests that are upheld, breaks found), improves the body of knowledge faster and with less Goodhart drift than academic publish-or-perish, because the only way to raise standing is to be right about things others test; this holds only if a break raises the finder's standing and lowers the filer's only when the filer's falsifier was weak, since a clean claim that later breaks is the system working.