abstain-disagreement-between-task-equivalent-prompt-regimes TEC-0067 · proposedAbstain on disagreement between task-equivalent prompt regim
Ask the same closed-book question under two or three equivalent prompt structures (direct, decomposed, incremental); if the answers disagree, treat the fact as unknown and abstain, since memorized facts are stable across regimes and halluci
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Ask the same closed-book question under two or three equivalent prompt structures (direct, decomposed, incremental); if the answers disagree, treat the fact as unknown and abstain, since memorized facts are stable across regimes and halluci Filed by the drafting stage from Decomposed Prompting Does Not Fix Knowledge Gaps, But Helps Models Say "I Don't Know" (2602.04853) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: F1 and AUROC as an error detector against verbalized-confidence and consistency baselines on multi-hop QA across model scales; training-free.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.