adversarial-issue-descriptions-apr-agents TEC-0091 · proposedAdversarial issue descriptions for APR agents
Embeds an attack-specific helper requirement (attacker-controlled env-var input plus a dangerous sink wired into the repaired symbol) into an otherwise legitimate bug report, framed as ordinary maintenance work.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Embeds an attack-specific helper requirement (attacker-controlled env-var input plus a dangerous sink wired into the repaired symbol) into an otherwise legitimate bug report, framed as ordinary maintenance work. Filed by the drafting stage from Adversarial Testing of Automated Program Repair Agents for Security Vulnerabilities (2609.15963) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Attack success rate (patch passes FAIL_TO_PASS and PASS_TO_PASS tests and contains the wired-in payload, confirmed by diff verifier plus a dynamic trigger harness) of 48.5-54.0% across three repair LLMs, versus 18.8-26.4% for the SWExploit baseline on 100 shared instances; 85.4% on the 206-instance subset with Claude Opus 4.5.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.