anchor-claim-consistency-graphs-trusted-priors TEC-0029 · proposedAnchor claim-consistency graphs to trusted priors
Decompose sampled responses and trusted source documents into atomic claims, build a weighted bipartite graph where prior-entailed edges cost least, and label each claim Grounded, Refuted, or Boundary by weighted closeness centrality.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Decompose sampled responses and trusted source documents into atomic claims, build a weighted bipartite graph where prior-entailed edges cost least, and label each claim Grounded, Refuted, or Boundary by weighted closeness centrality. Filed by the drafting stage from GRACE: Graph-Grounded Reflective Agent Copilot Engine for Expert-in-the-Loop Knowledge Expansion (2609.04442) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: QA accuracy and answerability against zero-shot partial/full context, RAG, and GraphRAG on 100 QASPER papers and 50 QuALITY articles; plus a confusion matrix against an LLM oracle showing 97.6% grounding precision and 85.5% of hallucinated claims placed in Boundary/Refuted.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.