tooling · atomic-fact-checking TEC-0001 · ratchet: gate

Check long answers fact by fact

Split a long answer into atomic claims and verify each against search or a corpus.

Decompose the output into individual factual claims, retrieve evidence for each, and label each as supported or not. Use it as a post-hoc filter on outputs or as an evaluation metric during development.

Addresses: Stating false facts confidently, Checking claims against evidence

Contexts: Retrieval-augmented QA, Chat assistant, LLM as judge

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

1 more condition from claims reviewed by AI, listed with the claims below.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the first capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.