calibrate-confidence-per-atomic-claim-per-response TEC-0100 · proposedCalibrate confidence per atomic claim, not per response
Split a response into atomic claims, score each by self-verification or token log-probability mixed with cross-sample consistency, then fit temperature or Platt scaling at the claim level so low-confidence claims can be routed to retrieval
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Split a response into atomic claims, score each by self-verification or token log-probability mixed with cross-sample consistency, then fit temperature or Platt scaling at the claim level so low-confidence claims can be routed to retrieval Filed by the drafting stage from Claim-Level Confidence Calibration for Reliable Decision Making with Large Language Models (2608.22483) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: ECE, smECE, Brier, AUROC, AURC against seven baselines (few-shot likelihood, CoT, verbalized confidence, PS, TS, LMvsLM, HalluMeasure) on TriviaQA and TruthfulQA across six models; best on GPT-4o/TriviaQA (ECE 0.006 vs 0.096 for TS), worse than TS on TruthfulQA (0.412 vs 0.118).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.