tooling · code-graph-tools-localization-agents TEC-0053 · proposed

Code-graph tools for localization agents

Parse the repository once into a heterogeneous graph of code entities and their dependency edges, expose search, traverse and retrieve-entity tools over it, and let the agent hop across the graph from the issue's mentioned names to the func

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Parse the repository once into a heterogeneous graph of code entities and their dependency edges, expose search, traverse and retrieve-entity tools over it, and let the agent hop across the graph from the issue's mentioned names to the func Filed by the drafting stage from LocAgent: Graph-Guided LLM Agents for Code Localization (2503.09089) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: File, module and function Acc@k on SWE-bench Lite and Loc-Bench against IR retrievers, procedural (Agentless) and agentic (MoatlessTools, OpenHands) baselines, with per-example cost; downstream Pass@1/Pass@10 with Agentless repair given each method's localization.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Finding what matters in a large codebase

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.