compute-lifecycle-consequences-harness-model TEC-0106 · proposedCompute lifecycle consequences in the harness, not in the mo
Where component dependencies and cleanup effects are explicitly represented, have the runtime enumerate legal teardown continuations and compute or verify the resulting state, leaving the model only the higher-level goal choice.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Where component dependencies and cleanup effects are explicitly represented, have the runtime enumerate legal teardown continuations and compute or verify the resulting state, leaving the model only the higher-level goal choice. Filed by the drafting stage from CordisBench: Can Language Models Reason About Component Lifecycles in Dynamic Agent Harnesses? (2609.01600) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: An independent finite reference semantics agreed with Cordis execution on every observation and action outcome used for scoring across all 528 executable questions, so the outcomes models got wrong were exactly computable at zero inference cost; the paper does not measure an end-to-end agent using this.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.