contrastive-module-scoped-harness-evolution-benchmark-disjoint-tasks TEC-0081 · proposed · ratchet: loopContrastive, module-scoped harness evolution on benchmark-di
Collect success and failure trajectories for the same task, aggregate the contrast across tasks into recurring behavioural deficiencies, attribute each to one of five harness modules, evolve each module inside its own modification scope, th
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Collect success and failure trajectories for the same task, aggregate the contrast across tasks into recurring behavioural deficiencies, attribute each to one of five harness modules, evolve each module inside its own modification scope, th Filed by the drafting stage from ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement (2609.14857) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Accuracy, Pass@3 and Pass-3 on TerminalBench 2.0 and SWE-Bench Verified for in-domain, cross-domain and cross-model transfer, plus an ablation comparing modular against non-modular and joint all-module evolution, where both non-modular variants scored below baseline. Developer-reported; one evolving backbone.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.