decompose-observation-into-sub-goal-sub-view-before TEC-0112 · proposedDecompose the observation into a sub-goal and sub-view befor
At inference, the agent splits each complex web observation into an aligned sub-goal and task-relevant sub-observation, self-scores the decomposition and action, and uses the passed/rejected trials as in-context demonstrations or as RL sign
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
At inference, the agent splits each complex web observation into an aligned sub-goal and task-relevant sub-observation, self-scores the decomposition and action, and uses the passed/rejected trials as in-context demonstrations or as RL sign Filed by the drafting stage from Learning Simple Test-Time Environments for LLM Web Agents (2608.29305) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Task success rate against no adaptation, SFT/RL with ground-truth rewards, TTT and TTRL: on CompWoB+ at 8 components 19%->61% (Qwen3-8B) and 46%->88% (GPT-4o-mini); on WebArena 12.1% base, 14.8% RL with ground truth, 12.5% TTT, 21.0% TTED-RL; WorkArena out-of-distribution 18.2%->22.7%. Ablations: removing sub-goal drops to 12.4%, sub-observation to 15.0%. Human agreement with reward labels 0.85 for TTED vs 0.71 TTT, 0.68 TTRL.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.