distill-chunk-boundaries-trajectory-induced-programmatic-skills TEC-0254 · proposedDistill chunk boundaries from trajectory-induced programmati
Induce two-level programmatic skills (composite skills made of ordered subskill calls) from successful trajectories, expand each subskill call into an action chunk whose boundary becomes an off-policy supervision target, and train the primi
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Induce two-level programmatic skills (composite skills made of ordered subskill calls) from successful trajectories, expand each subskill call into an action chunk whose boundary becomes an off-policy supervision target, and train the primi Filed by the drafting stage from Act More, Decide Less: Skill-Guided Adaptive Action Chunking for Long-Horizon LLM Agents (2609.02042) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Success rate and average LLM decision rounds on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld seen/unseen splits against zero-shot, ReAct, Reflexion, RLOO, GRPO, GiGPO and a variable-length multi-action GRPO under a matched rollout budget: ALFWorld 96.1/94.5 vs 89.1/83.6 for GiGPO at 5.0/5.2 rounds; ScienceWorld 67.2/61.7 vs 35.9/34.4; ablations removing skills (86.7/88.3) or chunk-aware advantage (90.6/89.1) each lose part of the gain.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.