drop-cae-scaffolding-supply-solver-tutorials-instead TEC-0256 · proposedDrop CAE scaffolding, supply solver tutorials instead
Run CAE simulation tasks with an off-the-shelf coding-agent harness (file, shell, multi-turn, execution feedback) and no simulation-specific roles, retrieval pipeline or reflection prompt, while requiring the agent to read the relevant solv
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Run CAE simulation tasks with an off-the-shelf coding-agent harness (file, shell, multi-turn, execution feedback) and no simulation-specific roles, retrieval pipeline or reflection prompt, while requiring the agent to read the relevant solv Filed by the drafting stage from What Do CAE Simulation Agents Really Need Beyond a Generic Harness? (2609.03718) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Task success under each benchmark's native criterion: FoamBench 96.4% (106/110) vs the specialized system's published 88.2%, MCP-SIM 100% vs 91.7%, ties elsewhere and 33.3% on FEABench; ablations on FoamBench show must-read tutorials 80.9% to 96.4%, repair budget 71.8% to 96.4%, and a scripted-reflection prompt changing nothing (96.4% both).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.