process · evolutionary-kernel-search-plus-c-level-functional-repair TEC-0257 · proposed

Evolutionary kernel search plus C-level functional repair, t

A multi-agent pipeline that injects Vitis HLS optimization priors, evolves kernel candidates under simulation feedback, verifies and repairs functional correctness by de-HLSifying the kernel and running C++ test programs, then generates hos

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

A multi-agent pipeline that injects Vitis HLS optimization priors, evolves kernel candidates under simulation feedback, verifies and repairs functional correctness by de-HLSifying the kernel and running C++ test programs, then generates hos Filed by the drafting stage from FPGAgent: An LLM-Assisted Framework for Autonomous HLS Code Generation and Verification in FPGA Environments (2608.23630) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Against zero-shot pass@10 on 78 HLS-Eval tasks across five models: +16.9% synthesizable, +26.7% executable, +30.6% functional correctness on average; ablation on Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B isolates each module (Eoh +17/+15/+9, Reflect -1/+2/+7, full +19/+22/+23).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Generating and editing working code

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.