process · evolve-data-generation-pipeline-pilot-sets-before-scaling TEC-0258 · proposed

Evolve the data-generation pipeline on pilot sets before sca

A controller compiles a data-preparation runtime specification, generates a small pilot dataset, assesses it against domain-selected quality criteria, and emits an adapter that revises specific pipeline components while preserving their int

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

A controller compiles a data-preparation runtime specification, generates a small pilot dataset, assesses it against domain-selected quality criteria, and emits an adapter that revises specific pipeline components while preserving their int Filed by the drafting stage from DataFoundry: Evolving Data Preparators via Recursive Self-Improvement (2608.29966) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Downstream benchmark averages after SFT on the produced data, versus DataFlow filtering pipelines, direct LLM generators, agent generators and skill generators including same-backbone controls: +3.3 Math, +1.3 Finance, +1.4 Law, +2.2 Medical over the strongest competitor on Qwen2.5-7B, and +3.8/+6.2/+7.9/+5.9 over the same-backbone skill generator; round sweep shows Math 25.6 to 28.4 to 28.8 then 26.1.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Improving its own scaffolding from failures

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.