process · gate-disclosure-through-structured-knowledge-tree-retrieve-generate TEC-0127 · proposed

Gate disclosure through a structured knowledge tree with ret

Store the authored facts, prerequisites and contradictions in a tree; one model picks the single currently-permitted unrevealed fact, a second writes dialogue constrained to it, and a third checks whether the fact was conveyed before the tr

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Store the authored facts, prerequisites and contradictions in a tree; one model picks the single currently-permitted unrevealed fact, a second writes dialogue constrained to it, and a third checks whether the fact was conveyed before the tr Filed by the drafting stage from Enforcing Narrative Reliability and Epistemic Pacing in LLM-Driven Detective Games via Structured Knowledge Trees (2609.23043) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Hand-coded hallucination rate over gameplay logs (17.80% of responses vs 6.27%), confessions extracted (10/33 vs 0/33), and a 9-item Likert survey where only progression and out-of-nowhere-reveal items differed; the tri-agent pipeline, the tree and the visual node board were evaluated together with no ablation.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Stating false facts confidently

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.