gate-extraction-through-versioned-rule-store-schema-consistency TEC-0128 · proposedGate extraction through a versioned rule store with schema a
Every extracted rule is written to a shared versioned store under a stable id, checked against 26 schema constraints, scored on five dimensions by an LLM judge whose minimum dimension decides auto-approve/review/reject, then filtered for du
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Every extracted rule is written to a shared versioned store under a stable id, checked against 26 schema constraints, scored on five dimensions by an LLM judge whose minimum dimension decides auto-approve/review/reject, then filtered for du Filed by the drafting stage from SAGE: Governed Artifact Generation from Enterprise Guidelines (2609.17775) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Compared against a monolithic one-pass baseline with the same parser and same models on the same 115 documents: hallucination 3.2% vs 15.7%, duplication 3.0% vs 10.3%, artifact rule coverage 93.7% vs 62.8%; a cumulative ablation attributes duplicate removal (117 units), 113 contradictions and 1,040 gaps to the consistency layer specifically. The L2 judge was checked against 300 blind expert rule labels (F1 0.957, kappa 0.813).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.