process · judge-each-rubric-item-against-full-agent-trajectory TEC-0136 · proposed

Judge each rubric item against the full agent trajectory

Convert a verified gold answer into a checklist whose items are each anchored to a hallucination subclass, then have an LLM judge issue a binary verdict per item against the agent's whole trajectory (reasoning, memory, tool observations) ra

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Convert a verified gold answer into a checklist whose items are each anchored to a hallucination subclass, then have an LLM judge issue a binary verdict per item against the agent's whole trajectory (reasoning, memory, tool observations) ra Filed by the drafting stage from LexAgentHallu: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Profiling Hallucinations in Legal Agents (2609.09754) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Not measured against human error-labelling agreement in the given text; validated indirectly by showing the metrics separate frameworks and scale monotonically within the LRAS family.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Stating false facts confidently

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.