keep-inter-agent-handoffs-user-s-language TEC-0137 · proposedKeep inter-agent handoffs in the user's language
Have agents pass extracted facts and answers to each other in the user's language instead of pivoting through English translation.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Have agents pass extracted facts and answers to each other in the user's language instead of pivoting through English translation. Filed by the drafting stage from Translating the Translator: Decomposing the Cost of English-Forced Inter-Agent Communication (2609.15079) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Exact Match and F1 on 300 XQuAD items per language for Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, native-handoff condition versus an otherwise identical English-pivot condition; all four paired differences significant under exact McNemar with Bonferroni correction, discordant pairs strongly asymmetric.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.