decoding · mask-decoding-verbatim-context-spans-inside-quotes TEC-0145 · proposed

Mask decoding to verbatim context spans inside quotes

When a quote-opening token is generated, restrict the next-token logits (via a suffix tree over tokenised retrieved contexts) to tokens that extend the current span into a continuous verbatim substring of some retrieved passage, plus the cl

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

When a quote-opening token is generated, restrict the next-token logits (via a suffix tree over tokenised retrieved contexts) to tokens that extend the current span into a continuous verbatim substring of some retrieved passage, plus the cl Filed by the drafting stage from Guaranteeing Faithful Evidence Extraction in Speculative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2609.10046) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: New Extraction Faithfulness Accuracy metric plus EM/F1/ALR and ROUGE-L/BERTScore/MAUVE/latency on MedMCQA, MESAQA, QuoteSum and a new SEMAeroSQuAD set, against SEMQA, NEST and a DistilBERT extractive baseline, three LLMs, two runs, with McNemar/Wilcoxon and Holm-Bonferroni correction.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Stating false facts confidently

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.