process · match-agent-hierarchy-task-interdependence TEC-0147 · proposed

Match the agent hierarchy to task interdependence

Construct a per-mission manager tree in which horizontal managers hand out concurrent assignments to their children and vertical managers decompose the mission into ordered phases and advance only when completion conditions are met, with re

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Construct a per-mission manager tree in which horizontal managers hand out concurrent assignments to their children and vertical managers decompose the mission into ordered phases and advance only when completion conditions are met, with re Filed by the drafting stage from ORCH: Organizational Principles Enable Collective Intelligence in Embodied AI (2609.11737) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Against four prior embodied multi-agent frameworks (CAMON, COELA, HMAS-2, Embodied) on 25 missions x 8 LLMs x 5 seeds: human-designed hierarchies improved final score 63.97% and execution efficiency (AUC of progress) 74.29% on average, LLM-generated ones 43.63% and 52.53%; first-place rank frequency 32.6% vs 5.8-16.2% for baselines; Type-II ANOVA showed a significant algorithm main effect and no significant algorithm-by-LLM interaction; success rates 35.2-53.1% vs 6.9-13.5%.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Getting more from several models than from one

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.