process · measure-proactive-monitoring-reflection-action-gap-traces TEC-0278 · proposed

Measure proactive monitoring and reflection-action gap from

Compute, from an agent's tool-call log, the share of non-infrastructure calls spent querying global state (PMR) and the fraction of commitments stated in its planning diary that are executed within the next K turns (RAG@K).

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Compute, from an agent's tool-call log, the share of non-infrastructure calls spent querying global state (PMR) and the fraction of commitments stated in its planning diary that are executed within the next K turns (RAG@K). Filed by the drafting stage from CivBench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Tool-Mediated Agents in Civilization VI (2609.02459) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Commitments extracted and labelled by an LLM against a fixed rubric; validated on a stratified sample of 50 commitments labelled independently by an author, 92.0% agreement, Cohen's kappa 0.879. Linked to outcomes via a missed-warning analysis: in 7 of 20 detectable defeats no victory-progress query occurred in the 20-turn window before game end.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Completing tasks that take many steps or many hours

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.