penalize-tokens-whose-pooled-rank-evidence-falls-below TEC-0155 · proposedPenalize tokens whose pooled rank evidence falls below their
At prefill, pool each candidate token's reciprocal vocabulary rank across all visual-token logit-lens readouts, cache it, and at each decoding step apply a bounded logit penalty to candidates whose pooled rank evidence falls below a token-s
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
At prefill, pool each candidate token's reciprocal vocabulary rank across all visual-token logit-lens readouts, cache it, and at each decoding step apply a bounded logit penalty to candidates whose pooled rank evidence falls below a token-s Filed by the drafting stage from ReWEIGH the Evidence: Calibrating Token-Level Ordinal Visual Evidence to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (2608.19075) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: CHAIR_I object-hallucination rate on open-ended captioning, reduced by up to 21.3% on four 7B backbones with descriptive and general multimodal scores largely preserved or improved, extended to 11 models from six families up to 32B, at 1.33% average added latency per token; token-specific references cut held-out calibration error 91-92% versus a global reference and beat all 1,000 random token-to-reference reassignments.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.