probe-consistency-four-axes-one-score TEC-0283 · proposedProbe consistency on four axes, not one score
Convert a binary question into an affirmative and a contradictory statement, re-ask each under semantically equivalent image transformations and paraphrases to form four consistency groups, and train a lightweight classifier on 14 within-gr
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Convert a binary question into an affirmative and a contradictory statement, re-ask each under semantically equivalent image transformations and paraphrases to form four consistency groups, and train a lightweight classifier on 14 within-gr Filed by the drafting stage from UHP Detection: LVLMs have their Unique Hallucination Pattern in the Consistency Space (2608.03817) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: AUC-ROC/AUC-PR against 7 white-box and 5 black-box detectors on AMBER and PhD across three LVLMs, with the same classifier pool and selection protocol for baselines; up to +18.72 AUC-ROC and +20.07 AUC-PR over the strongest black-box method; ablations removing each group or feature type, and cross-dataset transfer.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.