profile-review-critique-function-human-likeness TEC-0285 · proposedProfile review critique by function, not human-likeness
Annotate each review point against knowledge type, argument structure, question depth, cognitive complexity and feedback function so model and human critique are compared by what functions they perform rather than by textual overlap.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Annotate each review point against knowledge type, argument structure, question depth, cognitive complexity and feedback function so model and human critique are compared by what functions they perform rather than by textual overlap. Filed by the drafting stage from Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2609.01895) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Applied to ICLR 2025 human reviews versus baseline- and expert-prompted LLM reviews; the scheme separated the two sources into distinct functional profiles that overlap metrics would score as similar. No external validation of the annotation scheme reported.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.