tooling · react-loop-over-controllable-video-inspection-tools TEC-0167 · proposed

ReAct loop over controllable video inspection tools

A single agent iteratively calls video observation tools where it sets the time interval, frame rate and resolution itself, judging evidence sufficiency each turn before answering.

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

A single agent iteratively calls video observation tools where it sets the time interval, frame rate and resolution itself, judging evidence sufficiency each turn before answering. Filed by the drafting stage from AgentVidBench: A Multi-Hop Video Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Agents (2609.21386) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Accuracy and trajectory score on AgentVidBench against single-turn and three agentic frameworks; best accuracy 0.58 with Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 0.51 single-turn and 0.56 AVP, with ablations removing each control axis lowering accuracy (e.g. 0.50 without interval control).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Reasoning about time in video

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.