reject-tool-calls-do-resolve-registered-tool-signature TEC-0169 · proposedReject tool calls that do not resolve to a registered tool a
Before any permission gate, check each emitted call's name against the closed-world tool registry and type-check its arguments against the declared signature, rejecting anything unresolved.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Before any permission gate, check each emitted call's name against the closed-world tool registry and type-check its arguments against the declared signature, rejecting anything unresolved. Filed by the drafting stage from Closed-World Resolution Against Tool Hallucination in LLM Agents (2609.19425) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: On 322 live-model hallucinations and 400 scripted trials per class, the resolver rejected all H1-H3 cases while a gating-only stack executed them; but both the 322/322 execution and the 0/322 rejection are by-construction consequences of the fail-open threat model, and zero honest over-rejection is measured on the resolver's own honest-call generator, so only the emission counts are independent evidence.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.