replay-matched-trajectories-compare-confidence-to-action-maps TEC-0295 · proposedReplay matched trajectories to compare confidence-to-action
Collect each question's answer and confidence at every retrieval depth once, then replay the identical stored states through controllers that differ only in the confidence score supplied, so action differences are attributable to the score
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Collect each question's answer and confidence at every retrieval depth once, then replay the identical stored states through controllers that differ only in the confidence score supplied, so action differences are attributable to the score Filed by the drafting stage from Evaluating Confidence-Gated Retrieval with Matched Trajectory Replay (2608.26846) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Used to compare raw vs isotonic-calibrated verbalized confidence under an identical policy, budget and cost model on 2,457 test episodes across three models and two datasets, reporting overall accuracy, committed accuracy, coverage and mean retrieval actions jointly; no external baseline protocol compared.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.