report-operational-acceptance-reference-reconstruction-separately TEC-0174 · proposedReport operational acceptance and reference reconstruction s
Use parser, domain-conformance, planner, VAL and LLM-critic checks as the online stopping criterion, but compute renaming-invariant structural match and semantic equivalence against curated reference problems offline as a separate benchmark
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Use parser, domain-conformance, planner, VAL and LLM-critic checks as the online stopping criterion, but compute renaming-invariant structural match and semantic equivalence against curated reference problems offline as a separate benchmark Filed by the drafting stage from Grounded Evaluation and Repair for NL-to-PDDL Problem Generation (2609.09898) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Measured on 60-instance runs per setting: on PDDL 2.1, final operational success 0.500 (baseline) and 0.733 (few-shot) against final structural match 0.000 and 0.067, with 0.500 and 0.667 of examples operationally accepted but structurally unmatched; on Planetarium+FS, 0.583 operational versus 0.417 semantic and structural. A manual audit of 24 outputs found the LLM critic agreed with human faithfulness judgment in 13/24 cases.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.