prompting · retrieve-debate-memory-consensus-level-then-reweight-peers TEC-0301 · proposed

Retrieve debate memory by consensus level, then reweight pee

Each debating agent retrieves past-debate cases with an MMR trade-off whose relevance/diversity coefficient is set by the current consensus ratio (high consensus pulls in contrastive cases), and labels each peer's response high- or low-conf

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Each debating agent retrieves past-debate cases with an MMR trade-off whose relevance/diversity coefficient is set by the current consensus ratio (high consensus pulls in contrastive cases), and labels each peer's response high- or low-conf Filed by the drafting stage from Remember and Reweight: Enhancing Multi-Agent Debate with Experience Memory and Confidence Estimation (2609.03619) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Accuracy on four benchmarks against CoT, Self-Consistency, MAD and MAD-M2; retrieval-policy ablation against random, similarity-only, positive-only, diversity-only and three fixed-lambda variants (0.663 avg vs 0.635 random, 0.647 similarity, 0.657 best fixed); component ablation; and stance-transition rates on the shared-misconception subset (Engineering correct-to-wrong flips 0.410 to 0.255).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Getting more from several models than from one

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.