reward-each-model-peer-model-s-majority-vote TEC-0303 · proposedReward each model by a peer model's majority vote, not its o
Train several parameter-disjoint models simultaneously with RL, where each model's rollouts are scored against the majority-vote answer of a different model in the cohort, passed along a directed ring.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Train several parameter-disjoint models simultaneously with RL, where each model's rollouts are scored against the majority-vote answer of a different model in the cohort, passed along a directed ring. Filed by the drafting stage from Co-RL: Unsupervised Reasoning Emerges from Diverse Cohort in Multi-agent RL (2608.17253) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Average gains of 3.0-8.6% over base across seven text benchmarks and 2.3-7.2% across four multimodal benchmarks, beating TTRL, RENT, Intuitor, Co-rewarding-II, MAPoRL and CoMAS (+4.0% over CoMAS with half the agents), with a compute-matched control where two TTRL-trained models are ensembled at inference.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.