architecture · route-decoder-ffn-experts-task-identity-tokens TEC-0190 · proposed

Route decoder FFN experts by task identity, not tokens

Convert each LLM decoder feed-forward network into one always-active shared expert plus one expert per task, and select a single task expert for the whole video-prompt sample using the task label or nearest-neighbour matching of the prompt

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Convert each LLM decoder feed-forward network into one always-active shared expert plus one expert per task, and select a single task expert for the whole video-prompt sample using the task label or nearest-neighbour matching of the prompt Filed by the drafting stage from MoTE: Mixture of Task Experts for Multi-Task Video Understanding (2608.24763) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: COIN five-task average top-1 accuracy: 62.9% for task-index routing versus 61.5% dense all-expert activation, 61.4% learned token top-1, and 62.1% learned sample top-1, all under the same five-expert topology and backbone; also above matched 1B and 3B dense VideoLLM-online baselines (59.3, 59.9) and reported 8B baselines (61.8), while activating ~2B LLM parameters per sample.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Reasoning about time in video

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.