process · route-multi-agent-steps-over-gated-execution-memory TEC-0191 · proposed

Route multi-agent steps over a gated execution memory

A jointly trained router picks each step's role and backbone from a memory kept compact by learned write and retrieval gates, and halts when the memory holds enough evidence.

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

A jointly trained router picks each step's role and backbone from a memory kept compact by learned write and retrieval gates, and halts when the memory holds enough evidence. Filed by the drafting stage from Learning What to Retain: Gated-Memory Routing for Efficient Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM Systems (2609.00237) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Accuracy and token cost on five benchmarks against query-only routing (MASRouter), full-history routing (Puppeteer), fixed topologies (MacNet), AFlow; best average accuracy, +2.44 points over strongest baseline, -31.9% HumanEval cost; leave-one-out ablation of each module; three seeds reported in appendix.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Getting more from several models than from one

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.