process · route-prompts-align-lora-them-verify-public-tests TEC-0310 · proposed

Route prompts, align LoRA to them, verify on public tests

Picks a task-specific prompt template by keyword heuristics, fine-tunes a LoRA adapter on training inputs rewritten into that same template style, then samples several programs and returns the one passing the most visible public tests.

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

Picks a task-specific prompt template by keyword heuristics, fine-tunes a LoRA adapter on training inputs rewritten into that same template style, then samples several programs and returns the one passing the most visible public tests. Filed by the drafting stage from Route-Align-Verify for Functional Correctness in Code Generation (2608.03341) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: pass@1 on MBPP: base 0.8276/0.7528 (sanitized/full) vs full pipeline 0.8911/0.8520; Route+Align without verification only 0.8366/0.7640; repeated 120-task subsets gave a 95% CI of [0.0250,0.1417] on Full and [-0.0194,0.0722] on Sanitized; Jaccard contamination check found zero overlap.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Generating and editing working code

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.