score-detectors-paired-factual-counterfactual-decisions TEC-0195 · proposedScore detectors on paired factual/counterfactual decisions
Evaluate a hallucination detector by requiring it to accept the factual answer and reject the minimally edited counterfactual for the same video, reporting the joint success rate rather than one-sided accuracy.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Evaluate a hallucination detector by requiring it to accept the factual answer and reject the minimally edited counterfactual for the same video, reporting the joint success rate rather than one-sided accuracy. Filed by the drafting stage from Can We Trust Video Hallucination Detectors? VidHalLoc for Evaluating the Evaluators (2609.09895) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Applied to fifteen detection methods on 2,000 paired samples; separates factual, counterfactual and joint accuracy, showing dedicated detectors peak at 34.63% overall. No comparison against an independent human-detector reference for the protocol itself.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.