score-restraint-confidence-separately-against-matched-answerable-control TEC-0320 · proposedScore restraint and confidence separately against a matched
Classifies each response to an unanswerable boundary question as abstain, hedge, confident-correct or confident-wrong, computes calibration only on substantive answers, and pairs each context-withheld item with a restored-document version t
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Classifies each response to an unanswerable boundary question as abstain, hedge, confident-correct or confident-wrong, computes calibration only on substantive answers, and pairs each context-withheld item with a restored-document version t Filed by the drafting stage from Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty (2609.07879) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Applied to 42,000 model-item records across 14 routes; classifier checked against two blinded human coders on a stratified 560-response sample (human-human kappa .913, classifier-human kappa .414 four-class, .667 binary); matched restored-span control gave 96.6% restraint on missing-span and 99.2% correct on restored-span, 95.8% passing both sides.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.